Linux-Kernel Archive
By Thread

• Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction Eric W. Biederman (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:04:35 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction Hubertus Franke (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 09:12:03 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction Kirill Korotaev (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 10:40:41 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction Eric W. Biederman (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 11:40:59 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction Kirill Korotaev (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 10:34:01 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction Eric W. Biederman (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 12:16:53 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction Dave Hansen (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 15:42:38 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction Eric W. Biederman (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 16:04:32 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction Eric W. Biederman (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 19:25:58 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction Jeff Dike (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 21:19:29 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction Eric W. Biederman (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 22:17:01 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction Kirill Korotaev (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 09:24:05 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction Jeff Dike (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 10:37:50 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction Kirill Korotaev (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 10:44:33 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction Jeff Dike (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 12:48:12 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction Hubertus Franke (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 11:36:44 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction Jeff Dike (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 12:47:44 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction Sam Vilain (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 17:07:29 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH 1/4] Virtualization/containers: introduction Eric W. Biederman (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 16:57:45 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] mm: implement swap prefetching Con Kolivas (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:04:35 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] mm: implement swap prefetching Paul Jackson (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:12:20 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] mm: implement swap prefetching Con Kolivas (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:31:29 EST)
• Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown Willy Tarreau (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:15:17 EST)
  • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown Grant Coady (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:37:19 EST)
  • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown Lee Revell (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:42:10 EST)
  • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown Jan Engelhardt (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 12:05:14 EST)
    • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown Lee Revell (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 15:04:52 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown MIke Galbraith (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 01:28:21 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown MIke Galbraith (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 08:39:51 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown Lee Revell (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 14:01:35 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown MIke Galbraith (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 16:29:21 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown Lee Revell (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 18:22:23 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown Lee Revell (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 18:37:34 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown MIke Galbraith (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 22:01:53 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown Lee Revell (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 22:37:34 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown MIke Galbraith (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 23:56:03 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown Con Kolivas (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 00:03:42 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown MIke Galbraith (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 00:25:05 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown Con Kolivas (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 00:40:36 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown MIke Galbraith (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 00:49:24 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown Con Kolivas (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 01:07:19 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown MIke Galbraith (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 01:28:11 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown Lee Revell (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 01:59:52 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown MIke Galbraith (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 02:00:55 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown Lee Revell (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 03:41:06 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown MIke Galbraith (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 04:58:35 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown MIke Galbraith (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 07:27:41 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown Lee Revell (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 23:21:16 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown MIke Galbraith (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 00:20:55 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown Lee Revell (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 01:09:02 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown MIke Galbraith (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 02:17:23 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown Con Kolivas (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 02:14:08 EST)
      • Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown MIke Galbraith (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 02:33:57 EST)
• build breakage scripts/kconfig/conf carbonated beverage (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:16:45 EST)
• Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespacesimplementation. Eric W. Biederman (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:23:23 EST)
  • Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation. Hubertus Franke (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 09:44:38 EST)
    • Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation. Serge E. Hallyn (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 10:15:35 EST)
      • Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation. Kirill Korotaev (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 10:33:26 EST)
      • Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation. Hubertus Franke (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 10:56:03 EST)
      • Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation. Herbert Poetzl (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 14:00:32 EST)
      • Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespacesimplementation. Eric W. Biederman (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 11:48:44 EST)
    • Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespacesimplementation. Eric W. Biederman (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 12:46:45 EST)
    • Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation. Serge E. Hallyn (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 13:02:38 EST)
      • Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation. Hubertus Franke (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 13:29:19 EST)
      • Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespacesimplementation. Dave Hansen (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 15:20:20 EST)
      • Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation. Serge E. Hallyn (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 16:20:22 EST)
    • Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespacesimplementation. Eric W. Biederman (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 17:28:51 EST)
  • Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespacesimplementation. Stephen Hemminger (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 14:23:06 EST)
  • Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespacesimplementation. Eric W. Biederman (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 17:28:38 EST)
• Re: 2.6.15 Bug? New security model? John M Flinchbaugh (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:35:34 EST)
  • Re: 2.6.15 Bug? New security model? Bernd Schubert (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 07:13:15 EST)
    • Re: 2.6.15 Bug? New security model? Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 15:48:59 EST)
      • Re: 2.6.15 Bug? New security model? Bernd Schubert (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 16:44:20 EST)
      • Re: 2.6.15 Bug? New security model? Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 17:02:48 EST)
      • Re: 2.6.15 Bug? New security model? Sergey Vlasov (Sat Feb 11 2006 - 16:54:16 EST)
      • Re: 2.6.15 Bug? New security model? Bernd Schubert (Sat Feb 11 2006 - 18:52:58 EST)
      • Re: 2.6.15 Bug? New security model? Sergey Vlasov (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 13:47:59 EST)
      • Re: 2.6.15 Bug? New security model? Jeff Mahoney (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 12:55:39 EST)
      • Re: 2.6.15 Bug? New security model? Sergey Vlasov (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 14:19:22 EST)
      • Re: 2.6.15 Bug? New security model? Bernd Schubert (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 18:01:34 EST)
      • Re: 2.6.15 Bug? New security model? Sergey Vlasov (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 12:51:14 EST)
      • Re: 2.6.15 Bug? New security model? Bernd Schubert (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 18:08:45 EST)
      • Re: 2.6.15 Bug? New security model? Hans Reiser (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 00:45:31 EST)
      • Re: 2.6.15 Bug? New security model? Jeff Mahoney (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 10:19:25 EST)
      • Re: 2.6.15 Bug? New security model? Hans Reiser (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:37:35 EST)
• [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [1/25] generic funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:38:12 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [1/25] generic funcs Kyle McMartin (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:00:07 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [1/25] generic funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:17:06 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] Complain if driver reenables interrupts during drivers_[suspend|resume] & re-disable Dmitry Torokhov (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:38:45 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Complain if driver reenables interrupts during drivers_[suspend|resume] & re-disable Rafael J. Wysocki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:45:07 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Complain if driver reenables interrupts during drivers_[suspend|resume] & re-disable Nigel Cunningham (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 19:00:16 EST)
• [PATCH] powerpc: Thermal control for dual core G5s Benjamin Herrenschmidt (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:40:31 EST)
• [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [1/25] i386 funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:41:46 EST)
• [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [3/25] x86_64 funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:43:20 EST)
• PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [4/25] powerpc funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:45:45 EST)
• PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [5/25] alpha funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:47:53 EST)
• [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [6/25] arm funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:50:02 EST)
• [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [7/25] arm26 funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:50:51 EST)
• RE: [2.6 patch] let IA64_GENERIC select more stuff Chen, Kenneth W (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:51:19 EST)
  • Re: [2.6 patch] let IA64_GENERIC select more stuff Adrian Bunk (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 06:57:55 EST)
    • Re: [2.6 patch] let IA64_GENERIC select more stuff Jes Sorensen (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 08:37:10 EST)
      • Re: [2.6 patch] let IA64_GENERIC select more stuff Adrian Bunk (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 16:36:30 EST)
      • RE: [2.6 patch] let IA64_GENERIC select more stuff Chen, Kenneth W (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 17:24:16 EST)
      • Re: [2.6 patch] let IA64_GENERIC select more stuff Adrian Bunk (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 17:47:11 EST)
      • Re: [2.6 patch] let IA64_GENERIC select more stuff Jes Sorensen (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 07:51:17 EST)
      • Re: [2.6 patch] let IA64_GENERIC select more stuff Matthew Wilcox (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 08:16:06 EST)
      • Re: [2.6 patch] let IA64_GENERIC select more stuff Jes Sorensen (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 08:25:04 EST)
      • Re: [2.6 patch] let IA64_GENERIC select more stuff Adrian Bunk (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 09:14:28 EST)
      • Re: [2.6 patch] let IA64_GENERIC select more stuff Jes Sorensen (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 10:17:15 EST)
  • RE: [2.6 patch] let IA64_GENERIC select more stuff Luck, Tony (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 13:35:35 EST)
    • RE: [2.6 patch] let IA64_GENERIC select more stuff Alex Williamson (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 14:19:22 EST)
      • Re: [2.6 patch] let IA64_GENERIC select more stuff Jes Sorensen (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 14:22:41 EST)
      • RE: [2.6 patch] let IA64_GENERIC select more stuff Chen, Kenneth W (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 14:54:25 EST)
      • Re: [2.6 patch] let IA64_GENERIC select more stuff Matthew Wilcox (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 16:22:19 EST)
      • RE: [2.6 patch] let IA64_GENERIC select more stuff Chen, Kenneth W (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 16:36:52 EST)
  • RE: [2.6 patch] let IA64_GENERIC select more stuff Luck, Tony (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 14:48:10 EST)
  • RE: [2.6 patch] let IA64_GENERIC select more stuff Luck, Tony (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 17:34:55 EST)
• Re: Badness in sleep_on_timeout on kernel 2.6.9-1.667 ( fedora core 3) anil dahiya (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:52:29 EST)
  • Re: Badness in sleep_on_timeout on kernel 2.6.9-1.667 ( fedora core 3) Gaurav Dhiman (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:38:56 EST)
• [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [8/25] cris funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:52:51 EST)
• [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [9/25] frv funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:55:38 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [9/25] frv funcs David Howells (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 05:35:53 EST)
• [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [10/25] h8300 funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:57:20 EST)
• [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [11/25] ia64 funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:58:50 EST)
• [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [12/25] m32r funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:02:24 EST)
• [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [13/25] m68k funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:05:01 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [13/25] m68k funcs Kyle McMartin (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:08:34 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [13/25] m68k funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:42:45 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [13/25] m68k funcs Al Viro (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:13:35 EST)
• 2.6.16-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:06:22 EST)
  • Re: 2.6.16-rc2-mm1 Paul Jackson (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 16:15:15 EST)
    • Re: 2.6.16-rc2-mm1 Sachin Sant (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 05:29:45 EST)
  • [-mm patch] drivers/scsi/gdth.c: make __gdth_execute() static Adrian Bunk (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 19:35:39 EST)
    • Re: [-mm patch] drivers/scsi/gdth.c: make __gdth_execute() static Christoph Hellwig (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 08:09:23 EST)
  • [-mm patch] drivers/message/fusion/mptctl.c: make struct async_queue static Adrian Bunk (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 19:39:08 EST)
  • [-mm patch] drivers/video/geode/video_gx.c: make struct gx_pll_table_48MHz static Adrian Bunk (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 19:41:59 EST)
  • [-mm patch] fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h: #if CONFIG_SMP -> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP Adrian Bunk (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 07:29:13 EST)
  • Radeonfb ignores video= parameter [was: Re: 2.6.16-rc2-mm1] Mattia Dongili (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 09:50:23 EST)
    • [PATCH] fbdev: Fix typo in fbmem.c Antonino A. Daplas (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 10:12:35 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] fbdev: Fix typo in fbmem.c Mattia Dongili (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 11:31:43 EST)
  • Re: 2.6.16-rc2-mm1 Coywolf Qi Hunt (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 13:15:51 EST)
    • Re: 2.6.16-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 14:25:00 EST)
      • Re: 2.6.16-rc2-mm1 Coywolf Qi Hunt (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 15:04:03 EST)
      • Re: 2.6.16-rc2-mm1 Matthias Urlichs (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 15:21:28 EST)
  • Re: 2.6.16-rc2-mm1 Jim Crilly (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 16:29:20 EST)
    • Re: 2.6.16-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 17:24:47 EST)
      • Re: 2.6.16-rc2-mm1 Dave Jones (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 17:32:45 EST)
    • Re: 2.6.16-rc2-mm1 Jeff Garzik (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 17:26:46 EST)
      • Re: 2.6.16-rc2-mm1 Jim Crilly (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 17:29:07 EST)
  • Re: 2.6.16-rc2-mm1 Pavel Machek (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 16:53:44 EST)
  • Re: 2.6.16-rc2-mm1 Martin Hermanowski (Sat Feb 11 2006 - 15:37:06 EST)
    • Re: 2.6.16-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton (Sat Feb 11 2006 - 16:40:42 EST)
      • Re: 2.6.16-rc2-mm1 Martin Hermanowski (Sat Feb 11 2006 - 17:25:24 EST)
      • Re: 2.6.16-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton (Sat Feb 11 2006 - 18:33:23 EST)
      • Re: 2.6.16-rc2-mm1 Martin Hermanowski (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 07:08:17 EST)
  • Re: 2.6.16-rc2-mm1: crash on suspend Laurent Riffard (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 18:29:23 EST)
  • Re: 2.6.16-rc2-mm1 Alexandre Buisse (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 18:55:44 EST)
    • Re: 2.6.16-rc2-mm1 Andrew Morton (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 19:51:03 EST)
• [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [14/25] m68knommu funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:07:48 EST)
• [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [15/25] mips funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:10:16 EST)
• [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [16/25] parisc funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:11:47 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [16/25] parisc funcs Kyle McMartin (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:08:27 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [16/25] parisc funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:14:19 EST)
• No-execute support? Jan De Luyck (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:14:16 EST)
• [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [17/25] ppc funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:16:10 EST)
• Re: 2.6.16-rc1-mm5 Reuben Farrelly (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:18:28 EST)
• [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [18/25] s390 funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:18:28 EST)
• [RFC] EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FUTURE() Greg KH (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:18:51 EST)
  • Re: [RFC] EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FUTURE() Andrew Morton (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:31:48 EST)
    • Re: [RFC] EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FUTURE() Greg KH (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 13:18:55 EST)
  • Re: [RFC] EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FUTURE() Alan Cox (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 09:20:36 EST)
    • Re: [RFC] EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FUTURE() Greg KH (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 13:18:55 EST)
      • Re: [RFC] EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FUTURE() Alan Cox (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 13:35:02 EST)
  • Re: [RFC] EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FUTURE() Mark Lord (Sat Feb 11 2006 - 21:33:25 EST)
    • Re: [RFC] EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FUTURE() Greg KH (Sat Feb 11 2006 - 23:14:12 EST)
      • Re: [RFC] EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FUTURE() Mark Lord (Sat Feb 11 2006 - 23:16:18 EST)
      • Re: [RFC] EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FUTURE() Kyle Moffett (Sat Feb 11 2006 - 23:50:09 EST)
• kernel-2.6.16-rc2-git4 --- reiserfs write problems !!! art (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:22:35 EST)
  • Re: kernel-2.6.16-rc2-git4 --- reiserfs write problems !!! Marc Koschewski (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 07:33:07 EST)
  • Re: kernel-2.6.16-rc2-git4 --- reiserfs write problems !!! Ed Tomlinson (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 07:23:05 EST)
• [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [19/25] sh funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:22:35 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [19/25] sh funcs Paul Mundt (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 06:39:49 EST)
• [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [20/25] sh64 funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:23:47 EST)
• [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [21/25] sparc funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:27:37 EST)
• [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [22/25] sparc64 funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:29:24 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [22/25] sparc64 funcs David S. Miller (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:35:10 EST)
• Re: bad pmd filemap.c, oops; 2.4.30 and 2.4.32 Chris Stromsoe (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:30:51 EST)
  • Re: bad pmd filemap.c, oops; 2.4.30 and 2.4.32 Willy Tarreau (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:36:26 EST)
• [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [23/25] uml funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:32:55 EST)
• [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [24/25] v850 funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:36:26 EST)
• [PATCH] unify pfn_to_page take 2 [25/25] xtensa funcs KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:39:15 EST)
• [PATCH 00/23] -stable review Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:40:42 EST)
  • [PATCH 04/23] seclvl settime fix Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:40:42 EST)
  • [PATCH 21/23] [ALSA] emu10k1 - Fix the confliction of Front control Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:41:27 EST)
  • [PATCH 10/23] Input: iforce - do not return ENOMEM upon successful allocation Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:41:27 EST)
  • [PATCH 08/23] Input: db9 - fix possible crash with Saturn gamepads Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:41:59 EST)
  • [PATCH 19/23] [PATCH] bridge: netfilter races on device removal Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:42:18 EST)
  • [PATCH 23/23] [alpha] __cmpxchg() must really always be inlined Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:42:46 EST)
  • [PATCH 12/23] [SPARC64]: Kill compat_sys_clock_settime sign extension stub. Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:43:34 EST)
  • [PATCH 16/23] [PPP]: Fixed hardware RX checksum handling Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:43:34 EST)
  • [PATCH 09/23] Input: sidewinder - fix an oops Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:44:15 EST)
  • [PATCH 14/23] [PATCH] PCMCIA=m, HOSTAP_CS=y is not a legal configuration Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:44:29 EST)
  • [PATCH 18/23] [PATCH] x86_64: Clear more state when ignoring empty node in SRAT parsing Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:44:53 EST)
  • [PATCH 03/23] [PATCH] d_instantiate_unique / NFS inode leakage Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:45:30 EST)
  • [PATCH 20/23] [PATCH] bridge: fix RCU race on device removal Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:45:47 EST)
  • [PATCH 01/23] SCSI: turn off ordered flush barriers Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:46:12 EST)
  • [PATCH 11/23] Input: iforce - fix detection of USB devices Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:46:29 EST)
  • [PATCH 22/23] [PATCH] x86_64: Dont record local apic ids when they are disabled in MADT Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:46:53 EST)
  • [PATCH 02/23] [PATCH] dm-crypt: zero key before freeing it Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:47:08 EST)
  • [PATCH 17/23] [PATCH] x86_64: Let impossible CPUs point to reference per cpu data Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:47:33 EST)
  • [PATCH 15/23] [PATCH] SELinux: fix size-128 slab leak Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:47:47 EST)
  • [PATCH 06/23] Input: mousedev - fix memory leak Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:48:25 EST)
  • [PATCH 07/23] Input: grip - fix crash when accessing device Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:48:46 EST)
  • [PATCH 13/23] Fix keyctl usage of strnlen_user() Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:49:09 EST)
  • [PATCH 05/23] [XFS] fix regression in xfs_buf_rele Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:49:26 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH 13/23] Fix keyctl usage of strnlen_user() David Howells (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 05:07:34 EST)
  • [PATCH 24/23] md: remove slashes from disk names when creation dev names in sysfs Chris Wright (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 18:31:52 EST)
• Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Rafael J. Wysocki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:57:27 EST)
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Nigel Cunningham (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:35:19 EST)
    • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Pavel Machek (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 03:13:48 EST)
    • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Rafael J. Wysocki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 05:00:58 EST)
      • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Nigel Cunningham (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 17:52:50 EST)
      • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Pavel Machek (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 19:08:13 EST)
      • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Nigel Cunningham (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 21:48:05 EST)
      • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Pavel Machek (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 04:24:15 EST)
      • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Rafael J. Wysocki (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 08:19:38 EST)
      • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Nigel Cunningham (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 17:42:27 EST)
      • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Pavel Machek (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 18:32:44 EST)
      • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Nigel Cunningham (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 19:10:03 EST)
      • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Rafael J. Wysocki (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 07:34:20 EST)
      • Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Pavel Machek (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 18:33:25 EST)
      • Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Kyle Moffett (Sat Feb 11 2006 - 03:52:24 EST)
      • Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel]Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) hackmiester (Hunter Fuller) (Sat Feb 11 2006 - 12:05:34 EST)
      • Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Jan Merka (Sat Feb 11 2006 - 11:35:34 EST)
      • Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel]Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Theodoros V. Kalamatianos (Sat Feb 11 2006 - 17:21:02 EST)
      • Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Kyle Moffett (Sat Feb 11 2006 - 18:33:23 EST)
      • Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel]Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Alon Bar-Lev (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 03:49:34 EST)
      • Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Kyle Moffett (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 06:09:56 EST)
      • Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel]Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Alon Bar-Lev (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 07:04:41 EST)
      • Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Kyle Moffett (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 11:30:54 EST)
      • Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Valdis . Kletnieks (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 11:55:41 EST)
      • Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Kyle Moffett (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 13:28:17 EST)
      • Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel]Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Johannes Berg (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 07:11:27 EST)
      • Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel]Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Johannes Berg (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 07:09:46 EST)
      • Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) hackmiester / Hunter Fuller (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 11:40:18 EST)
      • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Nigel Cunningham (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 17:42:28 EST)
      • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Pavel Machek (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 18:23:18 EST)
      • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Sebastian Kügler (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 19:15:45 EST)
      • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Pavel Machek (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 20:11:10 EST)
      • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Matthias Hensler (Sat Feb 11 2006 - 05:40:34 EST)
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Pavel Machek (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 03:26:39 EST)
    • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Rafael J. Wysocki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 04:40:18 EST)
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Bodo Eggert (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 08:23:21 EST)
    • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Rafael J. Wysocki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 09:20:37 EST)
      • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) R. J. Wysocki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 18:18:29 EST)
• [PATCH 01/17] arm: fix dependencies for MTD_XIP Al Viro (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:08:27 EST)
• [PATCHSET] more assorted trivial annotations and fixes Al Viro (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:08:27 EST)
• [PATCH 04/17] powermac pci iomem annotations Al Viro (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:09:06 EST)
• [PATCH 07/17] sn3 iomem annotations and fixes Al Viro (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:09:07 EST)
• [PATCH 14/17] type-safe min() in prism54 Al Viro (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:09:45 EST)
• [PATCH 13/17] s390 __get_user() bogus warnings removal Al Viro (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:09:45 EST)
• [PATCH 16/17] m32r_sio iomem annotations Al Viro (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:10:26 EST)
• [PATCH 12/17] synclink_gt is PCI-only Al Viro (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:10:26 EST)
• [PATCH 17/17] sh: lvalues abuse in arch/sh/boards/renesas/rts7751r2d/io.c Al Viro (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:10:50 EST)
• [PATCH 11/17] __user annotations in powerpc thread_info Al Viro (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:11:12 EST)
• [PATCH 09/17] s390 misc __user annotations Al Viro (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:11:33 EST)
• [PATCH 10/17] fix iomem annotations in dart_iommu Al Viro (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:11:56 EST)
• [PATCH 03/17] s390x compat __user annotations Al Viro (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:12:18 EST)
• [PATCH 06/17] powerpc signal __user annotations Al Viro (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:12:46 EST)
• [PATCH 15/17] mark HISAX_AMD7930 as broken Al Viro (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:12:46 EST)
• [PATCH 08/17] compat_ioctl __user annotations Al Viro (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:13:32 EST)
• [PATCH 05/17] drivers/media/video __user annotations and fixes Al Viro (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:13:32 EST)
• [PATCH 02/17] mips: namespace pollution - mem_... -> __mem_... in io.h Al Viro (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:14:18 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH 02/17] mips: namespace pollution - mem_... -> __mem_...in io.h Maciej W. Rozycki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 06:00:45 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH 02/17] mips: namespace pollution - mem_... -> __mem_... in io.h Al Viro (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 11:12:40 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH 02/17] mips: namespace pollution - mem_... -> __mem_...in io.h Maciej W. Rozycki (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 11:19:49 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH 02/17] mips: namespace pollution - mem_... -> __mem_... in io.h Al Viro (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 11:31:11 EST)
• Re: Taking a break from Kernel Traffic Nuno Silva (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:23:18 EST)
  • Re: Taking a break from Kernel Traffic Jean Delvare (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 14:08:24 EST)
  • Re: Taking a break from Kernel Traffic Zack Brown (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 03:06:04 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] kretprobe: kretprobe-booster against 2.6.16-rc1 fori386 Masami Hiramatsu (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:23:39 EST)
• Question regarding /proc/<pid>/fd and pipes John Schmerge (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:25:11 EST)
  • Re: Question regarding /proc/<pid>/fd and pipes Bodo Eggert (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 15:52:44 EST)
    • Re: Question regarding /proc/<pid>/fd and pipes John Schmerge (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 22:20:55 EST)
      • Re: Question regarding /proc/<pid>/fd and pipes Bodo Eggert (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 04:01:12 EST)
    • Re: Question regarding /proc/<pid>/fd and pipes Jan Engelhardt (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 12:20:05 EST)
• Re: libATA PATA status report, new patch Meelis Roos (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:41:10 EST)
  • Re: libATA PATA status report, new patch Alan Cox (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 08:28:25 EST)
  • Re: libATA PATA status report, new patch Meelis Roos (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 13:27:22 EST)
    • Re: libATA PATA status report, new patch Alan Cox (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 10:28:50 EST)
      • Re: libATA PATA status report, new patch Meelis Roos (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 16:10:39 EST)
      • Re: libATA PATA status report, new patch Erik Mouw (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 07:00:06 EST)
      • Re: libATA PATA status report, new patch Alan Cox (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 10:42:09 EST)
  • Re: libATA PATA status report, new patch Kyle Moffett (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 13:05:42 EST)
• Re: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice day... Jan Dittmer (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:46:59 EST)
  • Re: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice day... Balbir Singh (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 13:04:19 EST)
    • Re: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Havea nice day... Jan Dittmer (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 17:40:40 EST)
      • Re: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice day... Balbir Singh (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 23:01:37 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] inotify: fix one-shot support Ingo Oeser (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:50:29 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] inotify: fix one-shot support Robert Love (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 11:17:46 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] inotify: fix one-shot support Ingo Oeser (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 03:40:55 EST)
• time.c vs. timer.c: patch snipplet Ulrich Windl (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:52:46 EST)
• Re: 2.6.16-rc1 panic on startup (acpi) Andi Kleen (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:57:01 EST)
  • Re: 2.6.16-rc1 panic on startup (acpi) Dave Jones (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 15:48:18 EST)
    • Re: 2.6.16-rc1 panic on startup (acpi) Dave Jones (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 15:56:18 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] add execute_in_process_context() API Andi Kleen (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 03:05:28 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] add execute_in_process_context() API Andrew Morton (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 03:17:09 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] add execute_in_process_context() API Andi Kleen (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 03:48:42 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] add execute_in_process_context() API James Bottomley (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 10:14:16 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] add execute_in_process_context() API Andi Kleen (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 10:16:41 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] add execute_in_process_context() API James Bottomley (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 10:56:04 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] add execute_in_process_context() API Andi Kleen (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 11:05:46 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] add execute_in_process_context() API Tejun (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 10:28:21 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] add execute_in_process_context() API James Bottomley (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 10:34:48 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] add execute_in_process_context() API Stefan Richter (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 07:45:00 EST)
• Last Patch to pdc_adma breaks debug compile Seewer Philippe (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 03:13:22 EST)
• /proc/pid/maps keeps growing Raj (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 03:22:20 EST)
  • Re: /proc/pid/maps keeps growing Avi Kivity (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 05:46:12 EST)
• Re: Linux drivers management Denis Vlasenko (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 03:25:50 EST)
  • Re: Linux drivers management Bernd Petrovitsch (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 04:44:30 EST)
  • Re: Linux drivers management Lee Revell (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 01:07:50 EST)
  • Re: Linux drivers management Andrew James Wade (Sat Feb 11 2006 - 13:45:27 EST)
• Re: [PATCH 2.6.15.3] alpha/pci: set cache line size for cards ignored by SRM Ivan Kokshaysky (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 03:36:41 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.15.3] alpha/pci: set cache line size for cards ignored by SRM Gabriele Gorla (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 21:15:48 EST)
• Re: quality control Jens Axboe (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 03:41:22 EST)
• Re: [2.6.15] frequent "BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0" in IDEsubsystem Folkert van Heusden (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 03:48:18 EST)
• Re: Elo touch panel Vojtech Pavlik (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 03:49:34 EST)
• Re: [SCSI] fix wrong context bugs in SCSI Jens Axboe (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 03:52:08 EST)
  • Re: [SCSI] fix wrong context bugs in SCSI James Bottomley (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 10:29:18 EST)
    • Re: [SCSI] fix wrong context bugs in SCSI Jens Axboe (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 10:48:24 EST)
      • Re: [SCSI] fix wrong context bugs in SCSI James Bottomley (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 11:40:25 EST)
      • Re: [SCSI] fix wrong context bugs in SCSI James Bottomley (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 11:47:03 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Ivan Kokshaysky (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 03:53:16 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Rik van Riel (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 17:30:12 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Rik van Riel (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 20:19:19 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Andrew Morton (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 22:04:18 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Andrew Morton (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 22:07:46 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Eric Dumazet (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 23:34:56 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Andrew Morton (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 23:44:23 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Paul Jackson (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 23:55:25 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Nathan Lynch (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 11:06:23 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Heiko Carstens (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 11:11:34 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Rik van Riel (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 11:38:17 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Nathan Lynch (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 11:57:44 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Andi Kleen (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 12:35:43 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Heiko Carstens (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 05:03:29 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Andi Kleen (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 05:11:44 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Heiko Carstens (Sat Feb 11 2006 - 09:47:33 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Andi Kleen (Sat Feb 11 2006 - 13:04:26 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Ashok Raj (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 12:03:50 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Nathan Lynch (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 12:21:58 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Andrew Morton (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 13:05:36 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Ashok Raj (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 13:58:33 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Andrew Morton (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 15:39:14 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Ashok Raj (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 16:05:00 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Andi Kleen (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 05:02:07 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Andrew Morton (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 05:45:04 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Eric Dumazet (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 06:09:36 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Andrew Morton (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 06:26:51 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Andrew Morton (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 06:26:09 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Eric Dumazet (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 09:16:21 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Nathan Lynch (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 19:09:27 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Andrew Morton (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 19:30:08 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Andi Kleen (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 07:11:20 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Andrew Morton (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 14:08:15 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Eric Dumazet (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 23:37:45 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Nick Piggin (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 23:44:45 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Chuck Ebbert (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 03:39:46 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Paul Jackson (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 03:55:03 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Andrew Morton (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 04:06:31 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Andrew Morton (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 04:10:28 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Heiko Carstens (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 05:06:51 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Andrew Morton (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 05:18:28 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Heiko Carstens (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 05:21:28 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Andrew Morton (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 05:30:21 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Heiko Carstens (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 06:51:13 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Eric Dumazet (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 07:44:45 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Heiko Carstens (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 08:10:50 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] percpu data: only iterate over possible CPUs Eric Dumazet (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 08:55:06 EST)
• [PATCH] block: kill not-so-popular simple flag testing macros Tejun Heo (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 03:55:36 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] block: kill not-so-popular simple flag testing macros Jens Axboe (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 04:00:36 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] block: kill not-so-popular simple flag testing macros Jeff Garzik (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 13:42:19 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] block: kill not-so-popular simple flag testing macros Tejun Heo (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 19:19:11 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] block: kill not-so-popular simple flag testing macros Jeff Garzik (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 20:17:51 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] block: kill not-so-popular simple flag testing macros Jens Axboe (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 02:21:08 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] Add Dell laptop backlight brightness display Pavel Machek (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 04:07:00 EST)
• Re: [PATCH] Add generic backlight support to toshiba_acpi driver Pavel Machek (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 04:08:24 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Add generic backlight support to toshiba_acpi driver Jan Engelhardt (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 11:46:02 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH] Add generic backlight support to toshiba_acpi driver Matthew Garrett (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 11:52:29 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH] Add generic backlight support to toshiba_acpi driver Jan Engelhardt (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 12:15:34 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH] Add generic backlight support to toshiba_acpi driver Ben Slusky (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 12:49:16 EST)
• [PATCH 1/2]MSI(X) save/restore for suspend/resume Shaohua Li (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 04:10:34 EST)
• [PATCH 2/2]remove msi save/restore code in specific driver Shaohua Li (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 04:10:34 EST)
• [patch] SLOB=y && SMP=y fix Ingo Molnar (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 04:11:42 EST)
  • Re: [patch] SLOB=y && SMP=y fix Matt Mackall (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 12:39:52 EST)
• [PATCH GIT] drivers/block/ub.c - misc. cleanup/indentation, removed unneeded return Marc Koschewski (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 04:30:55 EST)
• PREEMPT_RT and mptbase, mptscsih : I loose my file systems ( 2.6.15-rt16 ) Serge Noiraud (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 04:39:21 EST)
  • RE: PREEMPT_RT and mptbase, mptscsih : I loose my file systems ( 2.6.15-rt16 ) Moore, Eric (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 11:01:51 EST)
    • Re: PREEMPT_RT and mptbase, mptscsih : I loose my file systems ( 2.6.15-rt16 ) Serge Noiraud (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 11:24:21 EST)
• Re: preempt-rt, NUMA and strange latency traces Steven Rostedt (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 04:39:56 EST)
  • Re: preempt-rt, NUMA and strange latency traces Ingo Molnar (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 05:25:55 EST)
    • Re: preempt-rt, NUMA and strange latency traces Sébastien Dugué (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 05:42:09 EST)
  • Re: preempt-rt, NUMA and strange latency traces Sébastien Dugué (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 05:40:42 EST)
    • Re: preempt-rt, NUMA and strange latency traces john stultz (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 11:47:23 EST)
      • Re: preempt-rt, NUMA and strange latency traces Sébastien Dugué (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 06:06:50 EST)
      • Re: preempt-rt, NUMA and strange latency traces Sébastien Dugué (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 06:21:45 EST)
      • Re: preempt-rt, NUMA and strange latency traces john stultz (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 13:52:28 EST)
      • Re: preempt-rt, NUMA and strange latency traces Sébastien Dugué (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 08:02:43 EST)
      • Re: preempt-rt, NUMA and strange latency traces Lee Revell (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 14:06:03 EST)
    • Re: preempt-rt, NUMA and strange latency traces Lee Revell (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 01:02:41 EST)
      • Re: preempt-rt, NUMA and strange latency traces Sébastien Dugué (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 06:19:46 EST)
      • Re: preempt-rt, NUMA and strange latency traces Lee Revell (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 15:00:53 EST)
      • Re: preempt-rt, NUMA and strange latency traces Sébastien Dugué (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 08:14:57 EST)
• Direct Migration and "Affinity on next touch" ? Samuel Thibault (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 04:56:15 EST)
• libata PATA status report on 2.6.16-rc1-mm5 Chris Boot (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 04:58:23 EST)
  • Re: libata PATA status report on 2.6.16-rc1-mm5 Alan Cox (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 07:00:16 EST)
    • Re: libata PATA status report on 2.6.16-rc1-mm5 Chris Boot (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 08:35:57 EST)
      • Re: libata PATA status report on 2.6.16-rc1-mm5 Chris Boot (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 10:43:07 EST)
      • Re: libata PATA status report on 2.6.16-rc1-mm5 Alan Cox (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 12:22:19 EST)
      • Re: libata PATA status report on 2.6.16-rc1-mm5 Chris Boot (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 08:00:47 EST)
• Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 4/9] ppc64 - Specify amount of kernel memoryat boot time Mel Gorman (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 05:25:55 EST)
• [PROBLEM]: usb-mass-storage - amd64 Jan Christoph Uhde (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 05:27:24 EST)
• Re: [RFC][PATCH] unify pfn_to_page [6/25] frv pfn_to_page/page_to_pfn David Howells (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 05:34:45 EST)
• Re: [patch 15/44] generic ext2_{set,clear,test,find_first_zero,find_next_zero}_bit() Akinobu Mita (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 05:39:42 EST)
• Re: libata pata atapi errors Alan Cox (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 06:54:56 EST)
  • Re: libata pata atapi errors Ed Sweetman (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 16:02:16 EST)
• Re: [discuss] mmap, mbind and write to mmap'ed memory crashes 2.6.16-rc1[2] on 2 node X86_64 Bharata B Rao (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 07:03:24 EST)
  • Re: [discuss] mmap, mbind and write to mmap'ed memory crashes2.6.16-rc1[2] on 2 node X86_64 Christoph Lameter (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 10:41:13 EST)
    • Re: [discuss] mmap, mbind and write to mmap'ed memory crashes 2.6.16-rc1[2] on 2 node X86_64 Andi Kleen (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 10:43:49 EST)
      • Re: [discuss] mmap, mbind and write to mmap'ed memory crashes2.6.16-rc1[2] on 2 node X86_64 Christoph Lameter (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 10:57:33 EST)
      • Re: [discuss] mmap, mbind and write to mmap'ed memory crashes 2.6.16-rc1[2] on 2 node X86_64 Andi Kleen (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 11:05:46 EST)
      • Re: [discuss] mmap, mbind and write to mmap'ed memory crashes2.6.16-rc1[2] on 2 node X86_64 Christoph Lameter (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 11:18:35 EST)
      • Re: [discuss] mmap, mbind and write to mmap'ed memory crashes 2.6.16-rc1[2] on 2 node X86_64 Andi Kleen (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 11:26:44 EST)
      • Re: [discuss] mmap, mbind and write to mmap'ed memory crashes2.6.16-rc1[2] on 2 node X86_64 Christoph Lameter (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 11:49:53 EST)
      • Re: [discuss] mmap, mbind and write to mmap'ed memory crashes 2.6.16-rc1[2] on 2 node X86_64 Bharata B Rao (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 23:34:01 EST)
      • Re: [discuss] mmap, mbind and write to mmap'ed memory crashes 2.6.16-rc1[2] on 2 node X86_64 Andi Kleen (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 05:00:19 EST)
      • Re: [discuss] mmap, mbind and write to mmap'ed memory crashes2.6.16-rc1[2] on 2 node X86_64 Christoph Lameter (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 14:31:08 EST)
      • Re: [discuss] mmap, mbind and write to mmap'ed memory crashes 2.6.16-rc1[2] on 2 node X86_64 Bharata B Rao (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 00:39:36 EST)
      • Re: [discuss] mmap, mbind and write to mmap'ed memory crashes 2.6.16-rc1[2] on 2 node X86_64 Bharata B Rao (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 05:31:28 EST)
      • Re: [discuss] mmap, mbind and write to mmap'ed memory crashes 2.6.16-rc1[2] on 2 node X86_64 Andi Kleen (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 06:25:13 EST)
      • Re: [discuss] mmap, mbind and write to mmap'ed memory crashes2.6.16-rc1[2] on 2 node X86_64 Christoph Lameter (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 13:12:52 EST)
      • Re: [discuss] mmap, mbind and write to mmap'ed memory crashes2.6.16-rc1[2] on 2 node X86_64 Christoph Lameter (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 13:12:10 EST)
• [-mm patch] Makefile: remove a tab from an empty line Adrian Bunk (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 07:05:54 EST)
  • [-mm patch] Makefile: remove a tab from an empty line Adrian Bunk (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 09:56:10 EST)
• some stuffu Jefferson (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 07:18:43 EST)
• [PATCH] mv643xx_eth: remove repeated includes of linux/in.h and linux/ip.h Dale Farnsworth (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 07:26:24 EST)
• [patch] remove bogus comment from init/main.c Heiko Carstens (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 07:28:39 EST)
• [patch 01/10] s390: update default configuration Heiko Carstens (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 07:29:31 EST)
• [patch 02/10] s390: fix sclp memory corruption in tty pages list Heiko Carstens (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 07:30:38 EST)
• [patch 03/10] s390: earlier initialization of cpu_possible_map Heiko Carstens (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 07:31:40 EST)
  • Re: [patch 03/10] s390: earlier initialization of cpu_possible_map Dipankar Sarma (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 11:38:30 EST)
• [patch 04/10] s390: update maintainers file Heiko Carstens (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 07:33:33 EST)
• [patch 05/10] s390: add missing validation for dasd discipline specific ioctls Heiko Carstens (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 07:35:21 EST)
  • Re: [patch 05/10] s390: add missing validation for dasd discipline specific ioctls Christoph Hellwig (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 09:07:41 EST)
• [patch 06/10] s390: cleanup of dasd eer module Heiko Carstens (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 07:37:06 EST)
• [patch 07/10] s390: fix non smp build of kexec Heiko Carstens (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 07:37:54 EST)
• [patch 08/10] s390: add support for unshare system call Heiko Carstens (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 07:38:58 EST)
• [patch 09/10] s390: add #ifdef __KERNEL__ to asm-s390/setup.h Heiko Carstens (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 07:40:07 EST)
• [patch 10/10] s390: remove one set of brackets in __constant_test_bit() Heiko Carstens (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 07:41:09 EST)
• Re: [patch 6/6] [NETFILTER]: Fix another crash in ip_nat_pptp (CVE-2006-0037) Holger Eitzenberger (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 07:54:51 EST)
  • Re: [stable] Re: [patch 6/6] [NETFILTER]: Fix another crash in ip_nat_pptp (CVE-2006-0037) Greg KH (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 23:46:08 EST)
    • Re: [stable] Re: [patch 6/6] [NETFILTER]: Fix another crash inip_nat_pptp (CVE-2006-0037) Andrew Morton (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 00:00:03 EST)
      • Re: [stable] Re: [patch 6/6] [NETFILTER]: Fix another crash in ip_nat_pptp (CVE-2006-0037) Greg KH (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 00:06:26 EST)
      • Re: [stable] Re: [patch 6/6] [NETFILTER]: Fix another crash in ip_nat_pptp (CVE-2006-0037) Harald Welte (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 03:06:21 EST)
• [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Matthew Garrett (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 07:56:19 EST)
  • [PATCH, RFC] [2/3] ACPI support for generic in-kernel AC status Matthew Garrett (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 08:01:40 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Matthew Garrett (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 08:02:28 EST)
    • [PATCH, RFC] [3/3] APM support for generic in-kernel AC status Matthew Garrett (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 08:03:48 EST)
    • Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Greg KH (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 11:56:24 EST)
      • Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Matthew Garrett (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 12:07:11 EST)
      • Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Greg KH (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 12:15:07 EST)
      • Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Matthew Garrett (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 12:47:44 EST)
      • Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Greg KH (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 00:44:40 EST)
      • Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Gabor Gombas (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 03:51:57 EST)
      • Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Pavel Machek (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 07:19:57 EST)
      • Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Gabor Gombas (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 08:11:47 EST)
      • Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Matthew Garrett (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 08:17:33 EST)
      • Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Pavel Machek (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 08:52:36 EST)
      • Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Gabor Gombas (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 08:54:27 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Philipp Matthias Hahn (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 17:24:16 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Pavel Machek (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 07:19:19 EST)
  • Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Stefan Seyfried (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 03:05:14 EST)
    • Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Pavel Machek (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 07:17:30 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Stefan Seyfried (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 07:31:05 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Pavel Machek (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 08:45:25 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Jan Engelhardt (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 05:16:05 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Kyle Moffett (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 06:26:05 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Thomas Renninger (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 12:42:23 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Rafael J. Wysocki (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 15:14:45 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Thomas Renninger (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 07:35:14 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Matthew Garrett (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 07:49:50 EST)
      • Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status Thomas Renninger (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 10:02:40 EST)
• [no subject] Nicolas Mailhot (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 07:58:52 EST)
• Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 08:28:25 EST)
  • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) sean (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 08:43:23 EST)
  • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Martin Mares (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 08:49:47 EST)
  • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Keith Duthie (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 09:07:41 EST)
  • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Jim Crilly (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 11:27:12 EST)
    • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 11:32:34 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Jim Crilly (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 11:51:51 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 04:39:20 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Martin Mares (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 04:58:21 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Kyle Moffett (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 18:13:01 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Jim Crilly (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 20:50:38 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 07:24:42 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 07:15:17 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) D. Hazelton (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 07:39:39 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Christoph Hellwig (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 08:00:34 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Luke-Jr (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 11:30:34 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Matthias Andree (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 05:39:43 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 08:35:33 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Nick Piggin (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 08:58:13 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Ralf Müller (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 05:49:10 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Jan Engelhardt (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 11:28:28 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 11:46:55 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Jan Engelhardt (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 12:13:40 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 12:27:44 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Matthias Andree (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 12:34:19 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Jan Engelhardt (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 12:36:00 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux Jan Engelhardt (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 16:55:45 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 05:57:59 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Martin Mares (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 12:34:55 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 05:58:42 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Matthias Andree (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 06:45:24 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 07:35:07 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Martin Mares (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 07:39:54 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 07:58:32 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Jan Engelhardt (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 08:08:19 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 08:22:01 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Theodore Ts'o (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 09:15:13 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 09:33:06 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Christopher Friesen (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 09:43:39 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 09:52:15 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Christopher Friesen (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 10:12:15 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Chris Shoemaker (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 10:30:26 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Christopher Friesen (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 10:55:57 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Chris Shoemaker (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 13:50:01 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 05:33:20 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 05:30:57 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Martin Mares (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 05:53:31 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Matthias Andree (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 06:59:14 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Marcin Dalecki (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 00:22:12 EST)
      • vold for linux ? [was: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring upa hornets' nest)] Xavier Bestel (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 07:12:37 EST)
      • forget this maim (vold for linux ? [was: Re: CD writing in futureLinux (stirring up a hornets' nest)]) Xavier Bestel (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 07:17:14 EST)
      • Re: forget this maim (vold for linux ? [was: Re: CD writing in futureLinux (stirring up a hornets' nest)]) Jan Engelhardt (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:26:31 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) D. Hazelton (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 18:24:05 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Theodore Ts'o (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 09:50:46 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 09:54:05 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Erik Mouw (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 10:41:06 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Marc Koschewski (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 18:26:11 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Theodore Ts'o (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 10:55:57 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 05:45:04 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Theodore Ts'o (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 07:13:16 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 10:06:57 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Matthias Andree (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 10:24:14 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Jan Engelhardt (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:34:03 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Diego Calleja (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 11:23:04 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 05:46:37 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Florin Malita (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 10:35:13 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 10:56:24 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Diego Calleja (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:27:40 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Jan Engelhardt (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:37:20 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Florin Malita (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:39:24 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:43:56 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Luke-Jr (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 12:14:19 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Nikita Danilov (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 12:01:27 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Jan Engelhardt (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 05:02:53 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 09:08:22 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Matthias Andree (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 09:23:58 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Jan Engelhardt (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:23:16 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 05:15:03 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Matthias Andree (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 05:53:01 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) D. Hazelton (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 07:59:02 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 08:03:37 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Dmitry Torokhov (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 08:23:32 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) D. Hazelton (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 22:38:14 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) jerome lacoste (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 10:37:06 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Gene Heskett (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 11:22:15 EST)
      • [ot] Linux heritage (was Re: CD writing in future Linux) Jan Engelhardt (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 05:11:05 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) D. Hazelton (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 22:43:14 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 08:44:05 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) jerome lacoste (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 09:06:42 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 10:26:24 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) jerome lacoste (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 10:46:21 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:19:00 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) D. Hazelton (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 17:50:35 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 08:38:01 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Matthias Andree (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 09:31:38 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 11:55:16 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) D. Hazelton (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 17:16:34 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Jim Crilly (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 13:41:29 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Olivier Galibert (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 14:04:00 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) D. Hazelton (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 17:03:54 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) kernel (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 20:03:26 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 09:03:35 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 05:40:05 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Martin Mares (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 05:50:21 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 09:57:21 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Matthias Andree (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 10:01:39 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Jan Engelhardt (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:28:22 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:35:27 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Jan Engelhardt (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 03:06:10 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Jan Engelhardt (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:28:38 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Marcin Dalecki (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 00:19:46 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Martin Mares (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 04:25:09 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) D. Hazelton (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 04:52:16 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 10:11:33 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Lennart Sorensen (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 09:31:38 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) jerome lacoste (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 07:05:27 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 10:04:20 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) jerome lacoste (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 10:22:54 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 10:48:40 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) jerome lacoste (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:03:40 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:24:14 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Jan Engelhardt (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:32:16 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:36:55 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Valdis . Kletnieks (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 14:17:56 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 06:48:35 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) D. Hazelton (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 07:13:04 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 11:42:09 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) grundig (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 11:56:07 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 12:41:47 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) D. Hazelton (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 17:12:00 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Matthias Andree (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 07:21:28 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Rob Landley (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 17:49:05 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Olivier Galibert (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 18:22:05 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Rob Landley (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 19:24:43 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) D. Hazelton (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 21:08:23 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) grundig (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 21:31:31 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Matthias Andree (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 19:02:27 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Rob Landley (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 21:53:08 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Anders Karlsson (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 01:11:27 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Matthias Andree (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 03:35:09 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Lennart Sorensen (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 13:34:11 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Rob Landley (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 14:07:40 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Doug McNaught (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 14:14:44 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Rob Landley (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 14:45:46 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Lennart Sorensen (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 14:48:36 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Rob Landley (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 16:29:26 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) John Stoffel (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 22:07:54 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Rob Landley (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 22:30:59 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Alexander Samad (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 23:06:31 EST)
      • Message not available
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 11:51:41 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Matthias Andree (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 12:06:02 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Jan Engelhardt (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 13:03:08 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Lennart Sorensen (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 12:45:15 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Jim Crilly (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 13:40:53 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Carlo J. Calica (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 17:00:52 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Xavier Bestel (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:34:33 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) jerome lacoste (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 12:10:17 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 13:11:16 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 06:36:27 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) D. Hazelton (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 07:05:11 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 11:40:01 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) D. Hazelton (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 17:01:41 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) jerome lacoste (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 07:41:18 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 11:45:55 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) D. Hazelton (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 17:46:01 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) D. Hazelton (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 22:29:36 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 08:40:07 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Matthias Andree (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 08:50:38 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 10:15:04 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) D. Hazelton (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 18:15:30 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Martin Mares (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 09:05:48 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Joerg Schilling (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 10:29:00 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Jim Crilly (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:10:55 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) D. Hazelton (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 17:43:07 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Alexander Samad (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 00:08:21 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) D. Hazelton (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 18:02:52 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Alexander Samad (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 19:43:14 EST)
      • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) jerome lacoste (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 09:10:16 EST)